Theme 1 - comments collection
1
http://theoandmeth.blogspot.se/2015/09/reflection-of-theme-1.html?showComment=1442270830883#c3199125121651850432
Hi,In some degree,I agree with your conclusion as you mentioned in the end.About the "objective knowledge",it is always relative with subjective knowledge.It seems impossible to probe the authentic truth in our times.As I want to say,probably,the truth we pursue does not exist ever,because we always live in our own mind. is the mind really immense enough to figure it out? Or maybe I could see the truth as the synthesis of all the infinite dimensions,which are the kind of relations between the mirrorings of the world from all objects and the world itself.
http://theoandmeth.blogspot.se/2015/09/reflection-of-theme-1.html?showComment=1442270830883#c3199125121651850432
Hi,In some degree,I agree with your conclusion as you mentioned in the end.About the "objective knowledge",it is always relative with subjective knowledge.It seems impossible to probe the authentic truth in our times.As I want to say,probably,the truth we pursue does not exist ever,because we always live in our own mind. is the mind really immense enough to figure it out? Or maybe I could see the truth as the synthesis of all the infinite dimensions,which are the kind of relations between the mirrorings of the world from all objects and the world itself.
http://dm2572elvira.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-theory-of-knowledge-and-theory_14.html?showComment=1442272698577#c3191776890041345765
Hi,I think I have the same feeling with that you mentioned in the end.we also discussed that one “perception without conception is blind” Professor assumed a baby in a certain space where is no skills training,education,and language...... So he will perceive nothing and become a very different creature from us. I don't know exactly whether he could perceive somthing or not.I wonder whether this kind of ability to perceive is the "a prior". Thanks for sharing.
http://paullinderoth.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-theory-of-knowledge-and-theory_14.html?showComment=1442327675217
Hi,Tha you used "analytic judgement" and "synthetic judgment" to explain gives me a another way for me to understand what we could define it a priori or a posteriori.It seems that the two terms have a kind of causal relationship.It questions myself that there is the first of a priori in the beginning of our lifes?
4
http://elindm2572.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-reflection.html?showComment=1442329021480
Hi Elin,
I think you give me a good method to do the course.Before the seminar,I really feel difficult to finish a blog just through some philosophical terms without any discussions,even I checked in the wikipedia and another sources.
I think the seminar is really critical part.There is probably no absolute truth.We just said our own opinions and assumed some situations and tried to answer questions each other.Anyway,thanks for sharing.
5
http://butlikewhyisit.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-reflection.html?showComment=1442433776141#c5881693048895748760
Hi
I think I almost get the same with you in the 1st theme.From the cognition of humans,I remind one sentence is "Our world is always our world " We can't see the truth objectively.We just see the tip of iceberg. even we could not say some principle we get from the outside changes is truth. It's very practical to use in the academic research to make the work more critical and dialectical.Thanks for sharing.
6
http://ninopmedia.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-reflections-after-thelecture.html?showComment=1442440610499
Hi Nino,
I think you did a good job in 1st theme.In total,I think probably there are two key clues through the notional interpretations in pratical aspects.One is how we know the world and perceive it.The other is what kind of thing it is to see the world objectively. From your reflections,I am even clearer from the structural side.BTW I'm JUN :) Thanks for sharing.
7
http://theoryandmethodmediatechnology.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-theory-of-knowledge-and-theory_9.html?showComment=1442734785343#c2199781469391413632
Hi,about the apriori knowledge,professor assumed if we came to a room which exactly had 20 people.however,we can not clear how many people there without counting or other preparation.In some degree,it convinced the existence of a posteriori knowledge.I think there is the cause relationship between the apriori and posteriori knowledge.
8
http://tamfmtol.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-post-theory-of-knowledge-and.html?showComment=1442735726825#c9197172199610703688
Hi,I have the same opinions with you in a priori knowledge that we never clarify the truth in an objective way.In the end you mentioned that knowledge depending on experience.It seems convincing to interpret the existance of posteriori knowledge.However,if we cannot response to the external changes objectively,how could we utilize our experience to conduct the knowledge hierarchay which is authetic truth.It still questions me in some ways. Thanks for sharing.
9
http://dm2572byen.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-1-theory-of-knowledge-and-theory_13.html?showComment=1442738805028
The case about the radio transmission you mentioned is very vivid for words from Kant.Do you think it might be the potential cause relationship between the encrypted and decoding process ,or you could see them as a package.They would exist relying on each other. As a priori knowledge,it just exists without any past experiences. It questions on the form of existance of the conceptions. I think it would be right to understand as a posteriori knowledge . Thanks for sharing anyway.
10
http://blog4course99.blogspot.se/2015/09/reflection-of-theme-1.html?showComment=1442749193117
Hi,your reflection gives me a clear and understandable brief about what is apriori and posteriori form.Like you said we perceive the world in the framework of several categories that is a priori .and use these as the foundation to perceive the external changes.In Kant's theory,these changes just make us mess up.We observe objects subjectively in some degree.So the apriori and posteriori should constitude the knowledge.It might be some rules or belief we should follow.Thanks for sharing.
6
http://lard-have-mercy.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-theme-2-critical-media-studies.html?showComment=1443393881422#c31626620236608714
Hi,
I also get interested in the power that facilitate the revolutionary of culture.In my group,we discussed the mass culture which have the potential factors to promote or not.Because in my way,I treated it as the products to service people.But it do has the leadership to the public in a certain period or even a long term as the kind of enligntenment to the public.In some degree,it could change people's life.Thanks for sharing.
7
http://u1x5o721.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1443396815851#c5433463565813143779
Hi,I agree with your opinion for the "aura" you claim.To some extents, we always are influenced by mass medias .It can not be avoided to addict in the circle that was made by the reproduction or synthesized stuff.We could filter these before we accept them for building the more authentic culture.But we must admit that it should be the generation of the public requirement.It actually become the product for public consumption.Thanks for sharing.
8
http://cloudsong223.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2after.html?showComment=1443448022302
Hi,Good reflection you did.I think your instances inspire me to understand the nominalism in some way.I just confused about the nominalism and realism before the seminar.As you said.we define every leaf of a tree instead of giving the different meaning to every leaf.Probably,it just the way for us to categorize the objects we encounter as the realists.To some extents,I don't think it is necessory to figure them out,even the nominalism might live with every individual. Thanks for your interesting reflecion.
9
http://mediafluttery.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflectioncritical-media-studies.html?showComment=1443449417926#c6241899543169135889
Hi,you really did a structured summary in a great details to immerse there notions in the specific context.It facilitates a reachable access to help me make sense in the historical and natural aspect.Your view of our cognition changes as the progressive techniques is quiet similar with our perception which is naturally and historically determined.Thanks for sharing.
10
http://pargman420.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-reflection-2.html?showComment=1443451387875#c2846555982713894023
Theme 2 - comments
1
http://theorymethodmediatech.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-critical-media-studies-after.html?showComment=1442780695473#c5342949815647418267
Hej,I think you really did a good job.For the conception of "aura",it interests me a lot.You mentioned that the "aura" is situationally determined for the natural objects.Does this mean that we just utilize the objects in certain conditions meanwhile give them different meanings to prove their senses of existance? In my group,like we concluded,it should be the "soul" of objects to communicate with us.Thanks for sharing.
2
http://butlikewhyisit.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1442956600395#c2444619086245640149
I think your discussion about the mass media used to propagate politics is very brillant.It seems contradictory with the universal and objective value that media should have,however,it is reasonable that people use media for publicity and communication.As you said,we live in a information network.In some degree,every individual could be seen as a new media to process the information.We can absorb what we want and block what we refuse,then exchange with others.
Thanks for sharing
3
http://gklo.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-critical-media-studies-post.html?showComment=1443388891434#c7196627996076081446
http://fromplatotocasestudies.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1443389659908#c8246646876391797523
Hi,
I think "aura" is a term to replace the "soul" of the art objects.Like a human's heart,the art objects also have their central station for their own to control themselves and give them life,emotion and language.When you stand in the front of an art object,there should have a communication.You could have the feeling to understand it which is set by the artist,otherwise,you will feel nothing Because you only perceive it,it does not give a response.Thanks for sharing
5
http://gamlagreker.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1443392538483
Hi,
I think you consider the nominalism and realism in another way.Initially,I just thought the nominalism is about the things that we never need to be aware of or obtain.It already exist because our common knowledge live with it and rely on it.For the “Realism”，it should be connected with the rational thoughts and focused on the common perception instead of the perception for the external changes.Anyway, your reflection is very interesting to me,and give me new view to make sense.Thanks for sharing
http://theorymethodmediatech.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-critical-media-studies-after.html?showComment=1442780695473#c5342949815647418267
Hej,I think you really did a good job.For the conception of "aura",it interests me a lot.You mentioned that the "aura" is situationally determined for the natural objects.Does this mean that we just utilize the objects in certain conditions meanwhile give them different meanings to prove their senses of existance? In my group,like we concluded,it should be the "soul" of objects to communicate with us.Thanks for sharing.
2
http://butlikewhyisit.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1442956600395#c2444619086245640149
I think your discussion about the mass media used to propagate politics is very brillant.It seems contradictory with the universal and objective value that media should have,however,it is reasonable that people use media for publicity and communication.As you said,we live in a information network.In some degree,every individual could be seen as a new media to process the information.We can absorb what we want and block what we refuse,then exchange with others.
Thanks for sharing
3
http://gklo.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-critical-media-studies-post.html?showComment=1443388891434#c7196627996076081446
Hi,I totally agree with your opinion about our perception which is naturally and historically determined.And I think it reveals some situations in our daily life that are completely uncertain for us to face up.Like someone says “every thing doesn't change,but we have changed ”In the long term, our perception is running on the process.I think it is kind of protection system to make us fit the world better.Thanks for sharing
4http://fromplatotocasestudies.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1443389659908#c8246646876391797523
Hi,
I think "aura" is a term to replace the "soul" of the art objects.Like a human's heart,the art objects also have their central station for their own to control themselves and give them life,emotion and language.When you stand in the front of an art object,there should have a communication.You could have the feeling to understand it which is set by the artist,otherwise,you will feel nothing Because you only perceive it,it does not give a response.Thanks for sharing
5
http://gamlagreker.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1443392538483
Hi,
I think you consider the nominalism and realism in another way.Initially,I just thought the nominalism is about the things that we never need to be aware of or obtain.It already exist because our common knowledge live with it and rely on it.For the “Realism”，it should be connected with the rational thoughts and focused on the common perception instead of the perception for the external changes.Anyway, your reflection is very interesting to me,and give me new view to make sense.Thanks for sharing
http://lard-have-mercy.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-theme-2-critical-media-studies.html?showComment=1443393881422#c31626620236608714
Hi,
I also get interested in the power that facilitate the revolutionary of culture.In my group,we discussed the mass culture which have the potential factors to promote or not.Because in my way,I treated it as the products to service people.But it do has the leadership to the public in a certain period or even a long term as the kind of enligntenment to the public.In some degree,it could change people's life.Thanks for sharing.
7
http://u1x5o721.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflection.html?showComment=1443396815851#c5433463565813143779
Hi,I agree with your opinion for the "aura" you claim.To some extents, we always are influenced by mass medias .It can not be avoided to addict in the circle that was made by the reproduction or synthesized stuff.We could filter these before we accept them for building the more authentic culture.But we must admit that it should be the generation of the public requirement.It actually become the product for public consumption.Thanks for sharing.
8
http://cloudsong223.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2after.html?showComment=1443448022302
Hi,Good reflection you did.I think your instances inspire me to understand the nominalism in some way.I just confused about the nominalism and realism before the seminar.As you said.we define every leaf of a tree instead of giving the different meaning to every leaf.Probably,it just the way for us to categorize the objects we encounter as the realists.To some extents,I don't think it is necessory to figure them out,even the nominalism might live with every individual. Thanks for your interesting reflecion.
9
http://mediafluttery.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-2-reflectioncritical-media-studies.html?showComment=1443449417926#c6241899543169135889
Hi,you really did a structured summary in a great details to immerse there notions in the specific context.It facilitates a reachable access to help me make sense in the historical and natural aspect.Your view of our cognition changes as the progressive techniques is quiet similar with our perception which is naturally and historically determined.Thanks for sharing.
10
http://pargman420.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-reflection-2.html?showComment=1443451387875#c2846555982713894023
Hi,I have the same ideas with you about the natural and historical perceptions. In some way,it might reveal the truth why we always change our mind to the same thing.It gonna be like determining the results we perceive without any preconditions.The time and space you mentioned are completely natural perceptions.Your instance in the end is very interesting.Probably the wheel just exists before we get the wheel we have today. But I think they are the different stuff.For the first one, it should be the natural one concerned with the time and space.The second one,which is definitely invented by us,become the way to shape our perceptions in different historical context.Thanks for sharing
theme 3 - comments
1
http://remarkableathenianyouth.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-research-and-theory-or-what-maketh.html?showComment=1443822564092#c1091877887000923266
I actually do agree with your perspective about the explanation of "theory" which is casual relationship between the phenomenon and the nature behind the information you get.The famous words say "see through the appearance to the essence".We see it by our organ units,then,we want to know what happen in our surroundings.So we try to explore the wolrd with the assumptions and questionaires to support the theoretical systems.However,I think all the things should be based on the preconditions which is just like the instructor's talk at the beginning of the lecture "theory concerns with perceiving".That is why you get the bird flying backwards. Nice review.Thanks for sharing.
2
http://theoandmeth.blogspot.se/2015/09/reflectioin-theme-3.html?showComment=1443859084248#c6316661361137434296
Hi
Your opinion about the role of theory to guide our knowledge is quiet interesting.Yes,theory should have the objective description and judgement to reflect and generalize the information that we perceive and observe from the external changes in some way.It is given the value because we need it as a tool to find and
interpret more phenomenons.However,It's always in the process to develop and makes our conclusions end up with the knowledge.In the vein, we complete and detailing our knowledge system constantly and yet these still are progressive.Thanks for sharing
3
http://literaturestuffm.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-reflections-after-lecture-and.html?showComment=1443860332315#c702432073908996309
Hi,I think you really have a good understanding of the lecture with the clear and structured brief of theory and research.Actually,theory is the explanation of these phenomena that we observe.Meantime,research is based on previous theories to gather the data for supporting new theories in some way.In the vein,theory and the research constitute their inner circle to enlarge our views and complete our knowledge system.Thank you for sharing.
4
http://gamlagreker.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-reflection.html?showComment=1443861353080
Hi,I think these categories really give us the references to comprehend in different fields.I don't know the questions to be discussed in your group.In my group,we mainly discuss the difference of theory study between the humanity and natural science.I think I get a lot.As the humanity science,it should concern with the surroundings of the central terms while the natural science is based on the gathering data and giving the judgement in someway.thanks for sharing
5
http://pargman420.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-seminar-reflection-3.html?showComment=1443903032969#c3323006643001739539
Hi,
Actually,I still do not catch your ideas about the comparision between the scientific and philosophical theory.I do not think your discription about the empirical data used in the theory are very authentic,Because these data should be collected from the previous research based on the old theories in some way.The empirical data do not exist naturally.Like the professor said,the theory concerns with perceiving and observing to find the information from specific phenomena.In total,the theory and researchshould constitude a inner circle to develop by themselves.Thanks for sharing.
6
http://dm2572elvira.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-research-and-theory-post-seminar.html?showComment=1443903953411#c4872748771077485811
Hi,
I am also impressive about the talk of Lief you mentioned in the end.For the first sentence "Theory is about knowing and seeing",I think he wanted to reveal the origin of theory or the preconditions to create theory.Theory should concern with perceiving the world and processing by our minds."Theory is about not doing" actually does not mean that we do not do anything in my view.I think he just want to make a comparision with the aspect of practical study in research.Thanks for sharing.
7
http://capitalmyboy.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-post-theme-post.html?showComment=1443904674443#c3097283855112339844
Hi,
I think your explanation of "hypothesis" is quite easy to make sense.It always seems to appear in a scientific study.It is a kind of assumption or questionaire which is come up with before the framework of specific tests.It can facilitate and even direct the process of the research as a tool you said.Great review.Thanks for sharing.
8
http://oscarlimback.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-research-and-theory-after.html?showComment=1443905613866
Hi
Your discription of the relation between theory and practice is very interesing.At the start,you said the both should conflict with each other in the opposite mission respectively.One is doing,vice versa for another.Meantime,you argue that they influence and even rely on each other.Totally,I think the theory should be the preconditions to support the practice which try to probe more in a new context and even set up the new theoretical system.Thanks for sharing.
9
http://theorymethodmediatech.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme3-research-and-theory-after.html?showComment=1443906422299#c2652202980623684774
Hi,
Your discription of the discussion for categorizing the theory is very novel for me.I even never think about the topic.In my view,I might argue that there are not bad or good theories in deed,because the puzzle is how we could have a objective and common thoughts from the different individuals to judge it.It seems to go back the theme 1.I think the theory is better to divide with research areas.Thank for sharing.
10
http://dm2572byen.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-research-and-theory_27.html?showComment=1443907979169
http://remarkableathenianyouth.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-research-and-theory-or-what-maketh.html?showComment=1443822564092#c1091877887000923266
I actually do agree with your perspective about the explanation of "theory" which is casual relationship between the phenomenon and the nature behind the information you get.The famous words say "see through the appearance to the essence".We see it by our organ units,then,we want to know what happen in our surroundings.So we try to explore the wolrd with the assumptions and questionaires to support the theoretical systems.However,I think all the things should be based on the preconditions which is just like the instructor's talk at the beginning of the lecture "theory concerns with perceiving".That is why you get the bird flying backwards. Nice review.Thanks for sharing.
2
http://theoandmeth.blogspot.se/2015/09/reflectioin-theme-3.html?showComment=1443859084248#c6316661361137434296
Hi
Your opinion about the role of theory to guide our knowledge is quiet interesting.Yes,theory should have the objective description and judgement to reflect and generalize the information that we perceive and observe from the external changes in some way.It is given the value because we need it as a tool to find and
interpret more phenomenons.However,It's always in the process to develop and makes our conclusions end up with the knowledge.In the vein, we complete and detailing our knowledge system constantly and yet these still are progressive.Thanks for sharing
3
http://literaturestuffm.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-reflections-after-lecture-and.html?showComment=1443860332315#c702432073908996309
Hi,I think you really have a good understanding of the lecture with the clear and structured brief of theory and research.Actually,theory is the explanation of these phenomena that we observe.Meantime,research is based on previous theories to gather the data for supporting new theories in some way.In the vein,theory and the research constitute their inner circle to enlarge our views and complete our knowledge system.Thank you for sharing.
4
http://gamlagreker.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-reflection.html?showComment=1443861353080
Hi,I think these categories really give us the references to comprehend in different fields.I don't know the questions to be discussed in your group.In my group,we mainly discuss the difference of theory study between the humanity and natural science.I think I get a lot.As the humanity science,it should concern with the surroundings of the central terms while the natural science is based on the gathering data and giving the judgement in someway.thanks for sharing
5
http://pargman420.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-seminar-reflection-3.html?showComment=1443903032969#c3323006643001739539
Hi,
Actually,I still do not catch your ideas about the comparision between the scientific and philosophical theory.I do not think your discription about the empirical data used in the theory are very authentic,Because these data should be collected from the previous research based on the old theories in some way.The empirical data do not exist naturally.Like the professor said,the theory concerns with perceiving and observing to find the information from specific phenomena.In total,the theory and researchshould constitude a inner circle to develop by themselves.Thanks for sharing.
6
http://dm2572elvira.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-research-and-theory-post-seminar.html?showComment=1443903953411#c4872748771077485811
Hi,
I am also impressive about the talk of Lief you mentioned in the end.For the first sentence "Theory is about knowing and seeing",I think he wanted to reveal the origin of theory or the preconditions to create theory.Theory should concern with perceiving the world and processing by our minds."Theory is about not doing" actually does not mean that we do not do anything in my view.I think he just want to make a comparision with the aspect of practical study in research.Thanks for sharing.
7
http://capitalmyboy.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-post-theme-post.html?showComment=1443904674443#c3097283855112339844
Hi,
I think your explanation of "hypothesis" is quite easy to make sense.It always seems to appear in a scientific study.It is a kind of assumption or questionaire which is come up with before the framework of specific tests.It can facilitate and even direct the process of the research as a tool you said.Great review.Thanks for sharing.
8
http://oscarlimback.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-research-and-theory-after.html?showComment=1443905613866
Hi
Your discription of the relation between theory and practice is very interesing.At the start,you said the both should conflict with each other in the opposite mission respectively.One is doing,vice versa for another.Meantime,you argue that they influence and even rely on each other.Totally,I think the theory should be the preconditions to support the practice which try to probe more in a new context and even set up the new theoretical system.Thanks for sharing.
9
http://theorymethodmediatech.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme3-research-and-theory-after.html?showComment=1443906422299#c2652202980623684774
Hi,
Your discription of the discussion for categorizing the theory is very novel for me.I even never think about the topic.In my view,I might argue that there are not bad or good theories in deed,because the puzzle is how we could have a objective and common thoughts from the different individuals to judge it.It seems to go back the theme 1.I think the theory is better to divide with research areas.Thank for sharing.
10
http://dm2572byen.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-3-research-and-theory_27.html?showComment=1443907979169
Actually,I do not figure out the "empirical data" you mentioned at the start for the scientific theory.Is it collected from the critical research or acquired from our experiences?Meantime,I am also impressive for your discription of perceiving for theory. It seems to go back the theme 1.I always think we perceive the world with our bodies and minds,not only a orgen to just receive information.Like you said,probably,we see the external change first so that it inspire us to do more.But there is a processing to the data we get,at the same time,all the organs should work as the units.If we only have eys to see the world at the start,maybe we would get a totally different world.Thanks for sharing.
Theme 4 : comments
1
http://reb2572.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-theme-4.html?showComment=1444630914387#c4796128834451922429
Hi,
I totally agree on your opinion about the data collection for creating the forms of the research. Generally,it migbe be necessary to have the quantitative analysis before we start the further step detailing framework .In some way,the accurate data could lead us to the shortcut for the results we expect all the time,especially,when we have many accesses to be chosen.On the other hand,the data would be nothing without the guidance of quanlitative method in some cases.I think that's why you say that quantitative data can’t explain the results when there is a complex question.
2
http://dm2572byen.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-quantitative-research.html?showComment=1444632331936#c3744922366343414780
Hi,
I think your description of how qualititive and quantitative methods work together in a research work is quiet interesting.Because for many researches or tests we do not consider what kind of method we should definitely use before we formulate our works.The both should naturally complementary in our researches and affect direction and accuracy we expect so that the framework would be based on a stable system.We could easily find the access for supporting the measure or statistic we would use.Totally,the theme gives me more pratical reflections about my own works.Thanks for sharing.
3
http://pargman420.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-seminar-reflection-4.html?showComment=1444633579902#c2995299549476640720
Hi,
I have the same feeling with you for the central terms.In some way,I think it is more straightforward to use the quantitative and qualitative methods in our studies and researches.Acturally,in the seminar,we talked a lot about uses and choices of quantitative methods in different study area.And we mostly agree that the quantitative methods should be more pratical in the natural science.At least,we could collect data we expect.In other words,We connect the quantitative analysis with the data and its surroundings.But for the humanities,we are concern with the concepts.It is hard to shape the study and scale the results in an accurate way.I think it is not the whole of the concepts in the theme,however,the good way to make sense.Thanks for sharing.
4
http://ixxzw.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-3-after.html?showComment=1444641899558#c7766393430310270774
Hi
It is interesting to know the role of quantitative and qualitative methods in your way.But I'm not sure about the data driven analysis you mentioned.In my opinion,qualitative method is more like a direction or analysis in the certain context.quantitaive method might be data-based
as the means to support and reveal the new knowledge.As you said,they should be complementary in some way.Thanks for sharing
5
http://mediafluttery.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection.html?showComment=1444644709450#c7257156823239082802
Hi,
According to your description of the central concepts and cases you used to support your views,I think you really have probed and summarized a lot in this week. It's really interesting to know how we are conscious to do something with quantitative methods in our life,even if they seem meaningless as you said. Actually,We just naturally and unconsciously get involved in the rules to use our abilities for judging the objects. By the way,very enjoy to your clear and structured content. Thanks for sharing
6
http://elindm2572.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection.html?showComment=1444650336311#c899049362322534788
Hi,
The drumming experiment is also very impressive to me to understand the body ownership.I think it should be a kind of visual illusion which will give a wrong signal to our brain to react the judgement.In the seminar,we also discussed the up-side and down-side of quantitative methods.Actually,I don't think we need to figure out the criteria of quantitative methods,because it really depends on the certain context,meantime,they should be complementary in the research.Thanks for sharing.
7
http://suchapriori.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-theme-4.html?showComment=1444651274384#c353674343926202561
Hi,
I think your idea of “refining the questions through qualitative methods” inspires me a lot on my own work in some degree.Actually,at the start of one project or test,I generally feel many limitations to enlarge our horizon and open our ideas,even can not pose a few questions.The more questions mean the more details we could handle in the beginning.From this perspective of view,I think it is optimal aspect from the lecture to my study.Thanks for sharing.
8
http://theoatmeth.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-post-seminar.html?showComment=1444652228198#c5660889633821023142
Hi,
Your thinking of "qualitative data could be analysed quantitatively" is very impressive to me.Yes,It often happens in the research.I think there are still many differences between the kind of analysis and real quantitative analysis.From one aspect, I think the qualitative methods interpret the casual relationship between the nature and phenomenon.On the other hand,there are more judgements of features of objects in quantitative methods.However, I think your case is really vivid to understand.Thanks for sharing.
9
http://tamfmtol.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-post-quantitative-research.html?showComment=1444653337144#c354882319789701653
Hi,
Your comprehensions of quantitative and qualitative methods are very structured and clarify.We also talked about the differences and relations between the both.And put them in different study area.We finally found the complementary of them.They actually exist relying on each other in my opinion.For the "Drumming" research,I think it really helpful to make sense the qualitative methods.It totally provide the novel concept of body ownership. Thanks for sharing.
10
http://ninopmedia.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection-0-false-18-pt-18-pt.html?showComment=1444654175111#c9152106468630206157
http://reb2572.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-theme-4.html?showComment=1444630914387#c4796128834451922429
Hi,
I totally agree on your opinion about the data collection for creating the forms of the research. Generally,it migbe be necessary to have the quantitative analysis before we start the further step detailing framework .In some way,the accurate data could lead us to the shortcut for the results we expect all the time,especially,when we have many accesses to be chosen.On the other hand,the data would be nothing without the guidance of quanlitative method in some cases.I think that's why you say that quantitative data can’t explain the results when there is a complex question.
2
http://dm2572byen.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-quantitative-research.html?showComment=1444632331936#c3744922366343414780
Hi,
I think your description of how qualititive and quantitative methods work together in a research work is quiet interesting.Because for many researches or tests we do not consider what kind of method we should definitely use before we formulate our works.The both should naturally complementary in our researches and affect direction and accuracy we expect so that the framework would be based on a stable system.We could easily find the access for supporting the measure or statistic we would use.Totally,the theme gives me more pratical reflections about my own works.Thanks for sharing.
3
http://pargman420.blogspot.se/2015/09/post-seminar-reflection-4.html?showComment=1444633579902#c2995299549476640720
Hi,
I have the same feeling with you for the central terms.In some way,I think it is more straightforward to use the quantitative and qualitative methods in our studies and researches.Acturally,in the seminar,we talked a lot about uses and choices of quantitative methods in different study area.And we mostly agree that the quantitative methods should be more pratical in the natural science.At least,we could collect data we expect.In other words,We connect the quantitative analysis with the data and its surroundings.But for the humanities,we are concern with the concepts.It is hard to shape the study and scale the results in an accurate way.I think it is not the whole of the concepts in the theme,however,the good way to make sense.Thanks for sharing.
4
http://ixxzw.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-3-after.html?showComment=1444641899558#c7766393430310270774
Hi
It is interesting to know the role of quantitative and qualitative methods in your way.But I'm not sure about the data driven analysis you mentioned.In my opinion,qualitative method is more like a direction or analysis in the certain context.quantitaive method might be data-based
as the means to support and reveal the new knowledge.As you said,they should be complementary in some way.Thanks for sharing
5
http://mediafluttery.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection.html?showComment=1444644709450#c7257156823239082802
Hi,
According to your description of the central concepts and cases you used to support your views,I think you really have probed and summarized a lot in this week. It's really interesting to know how we are conscious to do something with quantitative methods in our life,even if they seem meaningless as you said. Actually,We just naturally and unconsciously get involved in the rules to use our abilities for judging the objects. By the way,very enjoy to your clear and structured content. Thanks for sharing
6
http://elindm2572.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection.html?showComment=1444650336311#c899049362322534788
Hi,
The drumming experiment is also very impressive to me to understand the body ownership.I think it should be a kind of visual illusion which will give a wrong signal to our brain to react the judgement.In the seminar,we also discussed the up-side and down-side of quantitative methods.Actually,I don't think we need to figure out the criteria of quantitative methods,because it really depends on the certain context,meantime,they should be complementary in the research.Thanks for sharing.
7
http://suchapriori.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-theme-4.html?showComment=1444651274384#c353674343926202561
Hi,
I think your idea of “refining the questions through qualitative methods” inspires me a lot on my own work in some degree.Actually,at the start of one project or test,I generally feel many limitations to enlarge our horizon and open our ideas,even can not pose a few questions.The more questions mean the more details we could handle in the beginning.From this perspective of view,I think it is optimal aspect from the lecture to my study.Thanks for sharing.
8
http://theoatmeth.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-post-seminar.html?showComment=1444652228198#c5660889633821023142
Hi,
Your thinking of "qualitative data could be analysed quantitatively" is very impressive to me.Yes,It often happens in the research.I think there are still many differences between the kind of analysis and real quantitative analysis.From one aspect, I think the qualitative methods interpret the casual relationship between the nature and phenomenon.On the other hand,there are more judgements of features of objects in quantitative methods.However, I think your case is really vivid to understand.Thanks for sharing.
9
http://tamfmtol.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-post-quantitative-research.html?showComment=1444653337144#c354882319789701653
Hi,
Your comprehensions of quantitative and qualitative methods are very structured and clarify.We also talked about the differences and relations between the both.And put them in different study area.We finally found the complementary of them.They actually exist relying on each other in my opinion.For the "Drumming" research,I think it really helpful to make sense the qualitative methods.It totally provide the novel concept of body ownership. Thanks for sharing.
10
http://ninopmedia.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection-0-false-18-pt-18-pt.html?showComment=1444654175111#c9152106468630206157
Hi Nino,
You do the excellent job evey time.I get a a lot from your posts. I also agree that the quantitative methods should be based on the data,which concern with the measure,statistic,analysis and etc.And it seems more suitable to use in natural science.Meanwhile,the qualitative methods should be reveal a kind of casual relationship between the central concept and its surroundings or the phenomenon and priciple. I think they should be complementary in the implementation of research. Thanks for sharing.
You do the excellent job evey time.I get a a lot from your posts. I also agree that the quantitative methods should be based on the data,which concern with the measure,statistic,analysis and etc.And it seems more suitable to use in natural science.Meanwhile,the qualitative methods should be reveal a kind of casual relationship between the central concept and its surroundings or the phenomenon and priciple. I think they should be complementary in the implementation of research. Thanks for sharing.
